Eric Blake wrote: > On the other hand, I just noticed that with -v, there is nothing output to > make it obvious when a copy was omitted because -n took effect; maybe it > would make sense for 'cp -vn' to be verbose about files that it refused to > copy because it would have clobbered a destination?
Sounds worthwhile. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
