> So -ol (that's an el) would mean line-buffered stdout? > That has to be equivalent to -o -l, and unless you consider > ordering and multiple -l options (e.g., "-i -l -o -l" is ugly), > then it doesn't let you line-buffer more than one of the three streams.
It would be "+i::o::e::" in getopt parlance; no argument = no buffering, argument is "l" = line buffering, argument is numberic = given-size buffer. Paolo _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
