Reuben Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's a suggestion that would be a lot simpler to implement: have pwd > implement -P as a no-op, and document the lack of -L, and the conflict > with the POSIX default behaviour. I'd be happy to write a > documentation patch. > > That will enlighten users; if anyone cares enough about coreutils's > pwd supporting -L (I don't) then they can code it.
Sounds good to me. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
