Eric Blake wrote: > On the other hand, POSIX is explicit that mixing signal and sigaction is > not portable. For that matter, now that gnulib provides a guaranteed > sigaction, why don't we just change all of coreutils to use it? Affected > are: csplit, dd, install, ls, nohup, sort, tee, and timeout.
Good idea. Perhaps we should just define our own signal() or bsd_signal() that calls sigaction() appropriately. I find signal() a much simpler interface than sigaction(). _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
