"James Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Although libgmp itself has no further dependencies other than the C > library, this is still a large-ish extra dependency. Should we also > introduce a --without-gmp option to configure?
Yes, particularly if it's added to 'expr'. > I also remember Jim mentioning something about supporting large > numbers in expr. That seems feasible, though based on the number of > discussions over the last year or two I would suggest that perhaps > using GMP in "seq" might also be a win; thoughts? They'd both be wins, I'd say. Also "test", right? Though that's lower priority. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
