Phillip Susi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> Here are two reasons: >> >> - lack of convincing arguments: any program that runs >> "ls -i non-directory ..." is not affected at all. > > Of course it is effected -- it takes much longer to run.
When I say "not affected" I mean it. Turning off the readdir optimization affects ls -i only when it reads directory entries. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
