Phillip Susi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> How about adding an option '-p' to 'tee', that causes it to ignore SIGPIPE >>> while writing to stdout? >> >> Just add a trap '' SIGPIPE before starting tee. > > Wouldn't that only trap SIGPIPE sent to the shell, not tee?
Ignored signals are inherited. > Aren't all signal handlers reset on exec()? Only handled signals. > It seems to me that tee should have a SIGPIPE handler which closes the > broken fd and stops trying to write to it, and if ALL outputs have been > closed, exit. That would not be compatible with POSIX. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
