Pádraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> Pádraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Jim Meyering wrote: >>>> By the way, does %zu work reliably everywhere now? >>>> In the past, we've converted such values to strings via umaxtostr, >>>> to accommodate older systems. >>>> >>>> For ssize and nsize, I have a slight preference for the >>>> cast-free approach of using %s with imaxtostr. >>> Yes I suppose %z and PRIdMAX are C99 specific. >>> How about the attached patch? >> >> Thanks! >> However, I'd prefer to keep the use of PRIdMAX, >> since gnulib's inttypes.h replacement lets us rely on that, >> if you don't mind. > > I'm a little confused. Did you change your mind and you > now want to keep the (intmax_t) cast in my original patch?
Sorry. I'm the one who was confused. The patch below is perfect. > I also noticed that the use of size_t is buggy anyway > in conjunction with off_t, so I've changed that. Good catch. >>From ee15430cb9b0de578269262ee149aa9350184354 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: =?utf-8?q?P=C3=A1draig=20Brady?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:10:13 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] truncate: Fix integer portability issues ... _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
