Poor Yorick wrote: > compiling 6.12.70-4f470 with 64-bit gcc (with -m64) and 64-bit gnu ld on > Solaris 9:
So on this system `timeout 4294967296 sleep 0` is invalid but `timeout 49711d sleep 0` is OK? The apply_time_suffix() function should be returning an error for the latter case but is not. I can't see the problem by inspection, so I need help from someone with a 64 bit system. I also noticed a couple of other problems in those parameter tests, fixes for which are attached. cheers, Pádraig.
>From 1d974563bccae68c9b15c4b9df30b4d65bb2fb11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf-8?q?P=C3=A1draig=20Brady?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:09:28 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] timeout: fixup invalid parameter tests tests/misc/timeout-parameters: remove test for invalid signal number and I don't know what signal number are invalid on all systems. Also tweak the other invalid signal check so that the rest of the parameters are correct. --- tests/misc/timeout-parameters | 5 +---- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/misc/timeout-parameters b/tests/misc/timeout-parameters index 091fbd7..e44ff98 100755 --- a/tests/misc/timeout-parameters +++ b/tests/misc/timeout-parameters @@ -41,10 +41,7 @@ timeout 4294967296 sleep 0 && fail=1 timeout 49711d sleep 0 && fail=1 # invalid signal spec -timeout --signal=invalid sleep 0 && fail=1 - -# invalid signal number -timeout --signal=128 sleep 0 && fail=1 +timeout --signal=invalid 1 sleep 0 && fail=1 # invalid command timeout 1 . && fail=1 -- 1.5.3.6
_______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
