[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Geng) wrote: ... > I think emitting into a .h file would be a good solution. But wouldn't > it then be better to directly add a genparse file (e.g. ls.gp) instead of > extracting it from ls.c? ls.c would no longer have to be modified then.
The disadvantage is that there would then be bits of code in ls.gp that depends on declarations in ls.c. I.e., "static", file-scoped variables in ls.c would now also appear in ls.gp. That is too distant for my taste. That would also add ~100 more version-controlled *.gp "source" files. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
