Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net> writes:

> 
> Thanks, but I'd like to retain the default (a deliberate "feature" 
> that ls -l --color does not stat the referent of each symlink it encounters.
> 
> From reading the comments, you can guess that this behavior change was
> deliberate.  Sorry I didn't make it clearer.  Dereferencing symlinks
> just to color them is highly undesirable (at least in some environments),
> hence the change so that ls --color no longer does that by default.
> The marginal benefit of coloring the RHS was outweighed by the potential
> negative impact of the additional stat calls.

Fair enough; but can we at least get it mentioned in NEWS that this was a 
deliberate change?

> 
> I think we'll need some new LS_COLORS-specified option to
> reenable coloring of the symlink referent in a long listing.
> 

And I agree with you that this can wait until after 6.11 to figure out the best 
approach for such an option.

-- 
Eric Blake




_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Reply via email to