[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> JM> It'd be great if you would suggest wording to document this discrepancy.
>
> The wording is fine as is.
> The problem is that you don't act according to your wording.
>
> You think "truncate fractional seconds, using one-second buckets to compare",
> whereas you need to use two-second buckets to compare if detected FAT,
> I suppose.
It's always simple in principle...
There are two ways to address the discrepancy:
- change code (probably impossible to do non-invasively and
efficiently enough to satisfy me). Evidence to the contrary
would be welcome, of course.
- document a subtle limitation encountered when using a losing file system
Guess which one I choose? ;-)
_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
