On Monday 31 March 2008 20:02, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like Michael's suggestion. Rephrasing it, > > if (SELinux, with no other MAC or ACL) > use '.' > else if (any other combination of alternate access methods) > use '+' > > If someone who already has a copyright assignment on file for coreutils > wants to write the patch (including doc update, tests, NEWS, ChangeLog, > etc.), please speak up ASAP. Otherwise I'll do it.
I still believe that as when running SE Linux all files will have contexts (the kernel code generates them if they are on a filesystem that doesn't support persistent storage of contexts or if they are unlabelled) then the SE Linux access controls should not be listed in "ls -l" output. That said, the above suggestion makes sense and would work reasonably well. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
