Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to Jim Meyering on 3/13/2008 4:44 PM: > | If consensus is for maint.mk, I'm happy to switch to that, > | assuming it's not too disruptive, otherwise. > | Far better to have only one such file name. > > Here's stage 1 of the sync for coreutils. The patch looks big, but that's > due to how 'git format-patch' handles renames. Once gnulib is further > fixed to dump GNUmakefile into the top directory, stage 2 would be using > the gnulib module rather than synchronizing the files. ...
Thanks! Almost perfect. There was one new 'make syntax-check' failure, because Makefile\.maint needed to be renamed in one more .x-sc* file. Also, the other two .x-sc renamings were not officially needed, since Makefile.maint no longer had to be listed as an exception. I've just removed those names, along with some other stale ones. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
