On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Bob Proulx wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > fchown(4, 0, 1017) = -1 EPERM (Operation not > > > permitted) fchown(4, 4294967295, 1017) = 0 > > > > i'm not seeing the second fchown(), just the first > > Is this still within the same failure space as the directory that was > go-rwx? Because if so then I think it means that this got the system > cp instead of the freshly built one. A cascade failure. Fixing that > should fix this too. I hope.
i looked but i missed that ... the strace shows execve() on the new `cp` failing with EACCESS as it uses the full path -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
