Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bob Proulx wrote: >> Vitaly V. Ch wrote: >>> As I understand ls require null-separated format of output stream which >>> will suitable for xargs. >>> >>> in this case I systematically use find instead of ls. >> >> Your message seems to be garbled and I, and perhaps others on the >> mailing list too, cannot understand what you are trying to say. If >> you have a bug please describe the problem such that we can recreated >> it. If you are requesting a feature then try to state the feature >> request in such a way that other people can understand it. Thanks. > > It reads to me like a request for ls to produce null-separated output, > so that > > $ ls -0 .
This comes close: $ printf "%s\0" * Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
