Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to Jim Meyering on 12/2/2007 3:24 AM: >> >> If you haven't heard about LZMA yet, see <http://tukaani.org/lzma/>. >> Since the lzma-compressed tarball is 2GB smaller than the .bz2 one, > > Pretty impressive, since the overall tarball is less than 1GB in size! > Oh, you meant 2MB. :)
Ha! Got me. :-) Actually, I *was* really impressed to see the size decrease from 5.6MB to 3.6MB, when going from bzip2 to lzma compression on the coreutils tarball. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
