Eric Blake wrote: > > This is a FAQ: > > http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/coreutils-faq.html#Why-doesn_0027t-rm-_002dr-_002a_002epattern-recurse-like-it-should_003f > > Speaking of which, the text for FAQ 14 (this FAQ) could use a revision - > it mentions removing all *.exe files three paragraphs before giving the > example, and at the end, refers to the next FAQ, when in reality, it > should refer to FAQ 16 on why recursion isn't built in to most of the > utilities.
You are quite right. Because of your prompting I have reworked the entry considerably. Thanks for that! Things are still not optimized since there are several that are all related but not grouped together but I didn't want to disrupt the anchor tags. Hopefully it is incrementally improved over the previous just the same. Side note: One of these days the FAQ entries will need to be reorganized and then the previous numbers and anchor tags will no longer map to the new locations. This is one of the reasons why I rarely refer to the entries by specific number or full URL tag. Bob _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
