-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Jim Meyering wrote: > I'm sure you've already heard it, but I have to say it: > You shouldn't use csh-based shells. > If you ask anyone or google, you'll find many good reasons. > Lack of a decent signal-handling mechanism is one of them.
Jim, Usually when I hear this, it's in reference to shell scripting, and not interactive shell use. The famous "Csh Considered Harmful" article, for instance, is explicitly in the context of shell scripts, and not interactive use. - -- Micah J. Cowan Programmer, musician, typesetting enthusiast, gamer... http://micah.cowan.name/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHK1zn7M8hyUobTrERCCx/AJ98q07a26xwTkSMcQZ5nLNGatkAbACeIkb9 AemM4lGRrbHpr/RVehQFRao= =ghCS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
