On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 05:35:43PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Geng) wrote: > ... > > file you extracted above is from the wc command. You can watch the genparse > > generated parser for it from > > http://genparse.sourceforge.net/examples/wc_clp.c. > > It's nice to see the continuing improvements. > > I noticed that you transformed the uses of fputs in wc's usage > function into uses of fprintf in your generated wc_clp.c. > That is probably ok in most cases, but in some (with a string > containing "%"), it's not -- unless you escape them. > Besides, I switched from fprintf to fputs for a reason: so that > I (and translators) don't have to worry about such escaping. > In addition, I don't mind that fputs is lighter-weight than fprintf.
Is there a special reason why you use fprintf (... , stdout) and fputs (stdout, ...) instead of printf and puts? Michael _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
