A new C99-syntax problem has appeared in 6.4 (after applying
c99-to-c89.diff), which is not the same as the ones I reported for 6.3.
A patch to fix it is appended.
---- Michael Deutschmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -durpN coreutils-6.4/lib/fts.c coreutils-fix/lib/fts.c
--- coreutils-6.4/lib/fts.c 2006-10-13 06:41:20.000000000 -0700
+++ coreutils-fix/lib/fts.c 2006-10-23 14:43:10.000000000 -0700
@@ -899,6 +899,7 @@ fts_build (register FTS *sp, int type)
bool nostat;
size_t len, maxlen, new_len;
char *cp;
+ bool is_dir;
/* Set current node pointer. */
cur = sp->fts_cur;
@@ -1073,7 +1074,6 @@ mem1: saved_errno = errno;
} else
p->fts_accpath = p->fts_name;
- bool is_dir;
if (sp->fts_compar == NULL || ISSET(FTS_DEFER_STAT)) {
/* Record what fts_read will have to do with this
entry. In many cases, it will simply fts_stat it,
_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
