Paul Eggert wrote: > Perry Smith writes: > > I sent it to myself as well and I got the attachment. Looking in my > > outbox, the attachment is on all three notes. > > Very strange. I didn't get the attachment in either of the > two emails you sent via the bug-coreutils@gnu.org mailing list.
I checked the mailing list configuration and there is nothing there enabled that I can see that would be stripping attachments. In the recent past other people have posted attachments okay. Examples: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2006-08/msg00025.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2006-10/msg00175.html > Looking at the mailing list archive (which lags behind realtime by a > day or so), the most recently sent attachment > <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2006-10/msg00237.html> > got expanded inline. I looked at the copy of that message in my mailbox and see this: Content-Type: text/x-csrc Content-Disposition: inline; filename=intparam1.c Content-Description: Bruno Haible's integer parameter program Because it was sent with "inline" disposition I think expanding it inline is the right thing for it to have done. The others were sent with disposition "attachment". > Also, lists.gnu.org was down for a few hours recently. Maybe > they've changed how they handle attachments, and no longer allow > binary ones. That would be bad. I think Mailman is still the same version at 2.1.5. > In the meantime, can you please send the info to bug-coreutils as > plain ASCII text, without attaching it? Thanks. I think keeping it simple is always a good course of action. Bob _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
