Pádraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The following obvious patch is needed for the memcoll change in 6.0.
Thanks, I applied it. Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I guess we did document in memcoll.c that memcoll explicitly sets > errno to 0 on success, making memcoll not quite like strcoll. Yes, that's the point for now. In the longer run I'd like to fix memcoll so that it always returns a reliable result, so that the user never needs to inspect errno. But for the short run let's just leave the interface alone. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
