Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to Jim Meyering on 2/9/2006 1:56 AM: >> I'm hoping to release coreutils-5.94 soon. If anyone sees >> something on the trunk that they want but that's not yet >> in 5.94, please speak up now. So far, my policy has been >> to apply only bug fixes. > > Whatever happened to this thread: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-11/msg00285.html
Thanks for bringing that up. In spite of saying I wanted to fix it for 5.94, I decided to let it wait. The probable fix and tests seem complicated/risky enough that I'd prefer to release 5.94 now. For example, the tests will have to be dependent on how rename works, and will have to ensure that e.g., rm -rf a b; touch a; mv a b/ still fails on systems with a rename syscall that honors trailing slashes. I'd rather see such changes made to the trunk first, and get some exposure through a test release. Besides, no one volunteered to do the work ;-) The code changes are trivial. Writing tests and changing documentation will take more time. The fact that changing this part of mv induces no failure (on Linux) in the test suite is a sure indication we need more tests. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
