Jochen Baier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> nanosleep({3, 0}, NULL) = 0
> even a self made program with uses the "sleep() or usleep()" C
> function show the same behavier.
That's strange, but it indicates that the problem is not with
coreutils or with the C library, but with your kernel's implementation
of nanosleep. I'd say you should pursue this with whoever maintains
your kernel.
_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
