seq should have some more options so one wouldn't have to use sed here: $ seq 0 10 100|sed 1d
_______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
- seq 0 10 100|sed 1d Dan Jacobson
- Re: seq 0 10 100|sed 1d Philip Rowlands
