On Mon, 10 May 2004, Paul Eggert wrote: >>shouldn't the configure script have a 'checking for gettext' stage? > >When you check source out directly from CVS, you're assumed to be an >expert, and to have the correct build tools even if they're not on >the standard list of tools all users are assumed to have. (The set >of "expert" tools includes CVS itself. :-) The "checking for" stuff >is designed more for non-experts, who are assumed to have tarballs >instead of checking things out directly from CVS.
That makes perfect sense. So when I check out of CVS, am I getting a slightly different code base from what goes into the tarballs? -- Ed Avis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
