On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 09:57:06PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote: > Thanks for clarifying things. I installed the following patch instead > of the patch I installed earlier; it uses comments along the lines > that you suggested. Please let me know if it doesn't seem right to > you.
Seems much better, just a pair of notes: > previous change, and is based on suggestions by Robbert Millan. Robert with one 'b' ;) > - netbsd*-gnu*) os='GNU/NetBSD';; > + netbsd*-gnu) os='GNU/NetBSD';; # NetBSD kernel+libc, GNU userland Please keep the '*' for this one, I'm not the maintainer of this and can't grant that they won't add information after the "-gnu". (Actualy, RMS suggested the -gnunolibc suffix) > + knetbsd*-gnu) os='GNU/KNetBSD';; # NetBSD kernel, GNU libc+userland > + kfreebsd*-gnu) os='GNU/KFreeBSD';; # FreeBSD kernel, GNU libc+userland These are ok without '*'. -- Robert Millan "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work." -- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion) _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
