"George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First off, I am not sure my first message made it to any where.

It did.

...
> I have two suggestions for split:
> 1) numeric suffix: I noticed that a numeric suffix options was purposed:
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2003-08/msg00020.html
> Perhaps a better way to specify this would be to use -e (extension) options, where 
> for example:
> -e n3
> would mean to use a 3 digit numeric extension. As well as:
> -e c3
> would mean to use a 3 digit alpha extension.
> The default would be to use the current 2 digit alpha extension.

This has been implemented recently:

* Major changes in release 5.0.91:
** New features
  ...
  split accepts a new option -d or --numeric-suffixes.

> 2) stdout output: Provide an option that causes split to output to stdout, so that 
> it can be used in pipe commands.  This feature would be useful so that the complete 
> set of output files would not have to be generated before they can be processed.  
> This feature becomes more important as the input file becomes very large, because 
> the very large storage requirements could be avoided.  Perhaps an option '-o1' could 
> be used to signify that it's output would be sent to stdout.

I don't see how this would be useful, since for any nontrivial
operation, split's output must go to separate files.


_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Reply via email to