https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32096
Bug ID: 32096
Summary: UBSAN issues in gprofng
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: sam at gentoo dot org
Blocks: 32092
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 15673
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15673&action=edit
gprofng.log
When looking at PR32092, I tried building with UBSAN in case it showed
anything. It showed a lot!
Build with C{,XX}FLAGS="-O2 -flto=jobserver -fsanitize=undefined" and
LDFLAGS="-fsanitize=undefined". I used
unreleased GCC 15 (gcc-15 (Gentoo Hardened 15.0.9999 p, commit
70f5adef33e0620d934fc7fb0822e592e3ff04a1) 15.0.0 20240814 (experimental)
10972e6fb59cf83e12dcf7d5d6db01aa8e38dc52) but I can reproduce with 14 too. I
didn't get any UBSAN issues without LTO.
As a horrible local hack to workaround PR32095, because I only needed to run
one test (for PR32092), I did:
```
--- a/gprofng/testsuite/gprofng.display/display.exp
+++ b/gprofng/testsuite/gprofng.display/display.exp
@@ -51,8 +51,6 @@ if { "$CHECK_TARGET" == "check-extra" || "$CHECK_TARGET" ==
"check-install" } {
} else { # "$CHECK_TARGET" is "check" or "check-DEJAGNU"
# dir cflags gprofflags tflags
set table {
- {"jsynprog" "-g -Wall" "-p on -j on" "-j add_int"}
- {"mttest" "-g -O0" "-p on" "-j calladd"}
{"synprog" "-g -O0" "-p on" "cpu"}
}
}
``
and
```
$ export UBSAN_OPTIONS="print_stacktrace=1:halt_on_error=0"
$
LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/15/libasan.so:/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/15/libubsan.so
make RUNTESTFLAGS="display.exp=synprog" check
````
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32092
[Bug 32092] gprofng testsuite fails with -flto (ERROR: comparison of results in
synprog failed)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
