https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26143
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at sourceware dot org> --- tom> I get the impression that the "which might not be the same as that of the following assembly instruction" formulation refers to a situation like this yup nick> what do you think that the assembler should be doing in this situation? ISTM that .cfi_endproc should implicitly bump (increment or reset) the view number. I don't think that would solve the issue of strict dwarf compliance though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
