https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #55 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to mintsuki from comment #54) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #52) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #51) > > > (In reply to mintsuki from comment #50) > > > > > > > > Why can't you check DF_1_PIE for PIE? > > > > > > > > That is what I do now, but to check for *relocatability*. PIE in and of > > > > itself is not something that tells me whether I should relocate (for > > > > KASLR > > > > for example) or not. That is what you just said. > > > > > > If DF_1_PIE is set, the binary can be relocated to any address. What did I > > > miss? > > > > The first PT_LOAD segment has non-0 p_vaddr, the program may misbehave if > > the load address != p_vaddr. > > How is this possible? Under which circumstances? It works fine with all the > other linkers for me. It works for your programs doesn't mean that it works all programs some of which won't correctly if ET_DYN is used. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
