https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25694
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Nelson Chu <nelsonc1...@sourceware.org>: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=225df051d3d4cf714d1791b9035966a6686b3f3d commit 225df051d3d4cf714d1791b9035966a6686b3f3d Author: Nelson Chu <nel...@nelson.ba.rivosinc.com> Date: Thu May 4 17:08:50 2023 +0800 [PR ld/22263][PR ld/25694] RISC-V: Avoid dynamic TLS relocs in PIE. Lots of targets already fixed the TEXTREL problem for TLS in PIE. * For PR ld/25694, In the check_reloc, refer to spare and loongarch, they don't need to reserve any local dynamic reloc for TLS LE in pie/pde, and similar to other targets. So it seems like riscv was too conservative to estimate the TLS LE before. Just break and don't goto static_reloc for TLS LE in pie/pde can fix the TEXTREL problem. * For PR ld/22263, The risc-v code for TLS GD/IE in the relocate_section seems same as MIPS port. So similar to MIPS, pr22570, commits 9143e72c6d4d and 1cb83cac9a89, it seems also the right way to do the same thing for risc-v. On risc-v, fixes FAIL: Build pr22263-1 RISC-V haven't supported the TLS transitions, so will need the same fix (use bfd_link_dll) in the future. bfd/ PR ld/22263 PR ld/25694 * elfnn-riscv.c (riscv_elf_check_relocs): Replace bfd_link_pic with bfd_link_dll for TLS IE. Don't need to reserve the local dynamic relocation for TLS LE in pie/pde, and report error in pic just like before. (riscv_elf_relocate_section): For TLS GD/IE, use bfd_link_dll rather than !bfd_link_pic in determining the dynamic symbol index. Avoid the index of -1. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
