https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28902
--- Comment #1 from Fangrui Song <i at maskray dot me> --- (I don't have a Fedora machine and I know very little about systemd.) I was asked why lld doesn't support -dT. I have dug up and found https://github.com/systemd/package-notes/blob/main/rpm/macros.package-notes-srpm#L52 %_package_note_flags %[%_package_note_status?"-Wl,%["%_package_note_linker" != "lld"?"-dT":"-T"],%{_package_note_file}":""] According to Debian Code Search ( https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=%5B-%5D%5B-%5Ddefault-script&literal=0&page=1), no project uses `--default-script` or `Wl,-dT`. > ld.bfd a.o -T a.lds -dT insert-note.lds --build-id # ok I suspect this is the reason https://github.com/systemd/package-notes/blob/main/rpm/macros.package-notes-srpm#L52 uses -dT. But this appears as an ill advice to me, working around a problem with an obscure option, instead of making the ld maintainer aware of the problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
