https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27753
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #2) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > > It sounds like .note.gnu.property section is unused. Please pass > > -R .note.gnu.property to objcopy to remove it. > > That's what I'm meaning to do as a workaround, but as per > > https://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2021-04/msg01002.html > > there are reservations against this approach. No workaround should have been > necessary here in the first place. > > Perhaps the issue wouldn't have occurred if the section hadn't SHF_ALLOC > set. Is there a specific reason for this? The gABI looks to mandate the flag > to be clear for SHT_NOTE type sections. All note sections in Linux binary have SHF_ALLOC: [ 2] .note.gnu.build-id NOTE 004001d0 0001d0 000024 00 A 0 0 4 [ 3] .note.gnu.property NOTE 004001f4 0001f4 000034 00 A 0 0 4 [ 4] .note.ABI-tag NOTE 00400228 000228 000020 00 A 0 0 4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.