https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27441
--- Comment #12 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Michael Matz from comment #11) > Yes, I thought so as well, until I read ELF.txt again :) Huh, I can hardly believe I was making such a completely wrong assumption. How stupid is that? I just checked elflink.c plus archive.c code and ran a test to properly convince myself I was wrong. Yes, a weak definition does indeed cause an archive element to be extracted to satisfy a strong undefined reference. Testing the binding of the definition was just plain wrong. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
