https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25750
--- Comment #6 from Jian Cai <caij2003 at gmail dot com> --- > So this: > > .macro foo insn1 insn2 > \insn1 \insn2 > .endm > > foo .section .sec1 > > Does work. Thanks for the suggestion. I found this issue while working on https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/939. Essentially, the following case assembled with arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc but not clang. $ cat bad.s .macro alternative_insn insn1 .endm alternative_insn .inst (0x0) There were several ways to make it work with clang, including removing the space between .inst and its argument, quoting the directive and its arguments, and now using vararg as you suggested. I made an LLVM patch for (https://reviews.llvm.org/D76962), which will make clang's integrated assembler to treat .inst and its arguments as one macro argument in the above example. It did not go though upstream review as it would create mismatch between clang and gcc, so I am curious if gcc is interested to have more general support, so that code like the example in Comment 4 will work without being rewritten. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
