https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25614
--- Comment #14 from David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #13) > (In reply to David Blaikie from comment #12) > Hi David, > > > > One question - what is the .addrsig directive ? It is in the foo.s file > > > that you uploaded (near the end) but gas does not recognise it. > > > > Here's the documentation for the addrsig LLVM extension: > > https://llvm.org/docs/Extensions.html#sht-llvm-addrsig-section-address- > > significance-table > > Thanks for the reference. This is obviously a new feature, so it will > need a new PR being filed. Ideally of course someone from the LLVM > community will offer a patch to add the feature, but if that does not > happen then I will put it on my (long) list of things to do. > > Cheers > Nick *nod* seems unlikely it'd be a high priority for participants either project, unless GCC folks find the feature itself to be valuable, want to implement it in gold/binutils ld, etc. Arguably LLVM/Clang could probably use a mode (& probably should be the default behavior for -fno-integrated-as, though overridable) that produces binutils as-compatible assembly & skip features like this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
