https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23825
--- Comment #8 from Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> --- To clarify what I mean about ABI and copy relocations, prior to RISC-V doing this, there was no arch where it was unsafe to have extensible (existing part's meaning remains same, new parts added to end) arrays or structs in shared library TLS. This kind of thing is very useful for dispatch arrays, etc. Copy relocations break that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
