https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23839
--- Comment #4 from Philippe Daouadi <blastrock at free dot fr> --- Hi Nick, > there are cases > where it is valid for a relocation to have an offset that is larger than the > section size I didn't know that, what kind of case would that be? Is it really possible to predict what will be the next section? > By the way, what configuration are you using ? I'm not sure about what you mean by 'configuration'. This is how binutils is built: https://github.com/vitasdk/buildscripts/blob/592a603585e1939fe60c0226a47d6d01a88f3192/CMakeLists.txt#L309 You can look at the rest of the file and repository to see how the rest is built. > Unfortunately it seems that in order to fix this problem we are really > going to need a reproducer. I'll be busy next week, but I will try to set up a small reproduction case when I come back the week after. No guarantees though :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
