https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23460
Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Last reconfirmed| |2018-08-21 Resolution|FIXED |--- Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #22 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> --- (In reply to zenith432 from comment #21) Hi Zenith, > Attached is a patch that implements algorithm suggested in comment 18. I am confused by this part of the patch: for (plugin_list_iter = plugin_list; plugin_list_iter != NULL; plugin_list_iter = plugin_list_iter->next) { if (plugin_handle == plugin_list_iter->handle) { dlclose (plugin_handle); if (!plugin_list_iter->claim_file) return 0; register_claim_file (plugin_list_iter->claim_file); goto have_claim_file; } } If I am reading this correctly, this says that if we are attempting to load a plugin that was previously loaded, then we call dlclose() on it, and then, if the plugin has a file claim function, we register this function as the global file claimant, despite the plugin having been closed... Is that right ? Also - it seems to me that if we have a list of loaded plugins, then we no longer need the claim_file global variable, and the try_claim() function should walk the list of plugins, trying each in turn. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils