https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23424
--- Comment #2 from Cary Coutant <ccoutant at gmail dot com> --- > It seems that using PTHREAD_ONCE_INIT can only be used in a static context, as > documented in the man page (https://linux.die.net/man/3/pthread_once). Since > it's POD, doing a deep copy with a statically initialized dummy should be a > pragmatic workaround (see attached patch). Can you point out where in that man page you found this? I've read several man pages for pthread_once, and can't find any such restriction on the use of PTHREAD_ONCE_INIT. > Side note - the man page says that "The behavior of pthread_once() is > undefined > if once_control has automatic storage duration", which might happen when using > the Once class. I'm pretty sure that all classes that derive from Once are allocated either statically or with new. This shouldn't be an issue. -cary -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
