https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22706
Bug ID: 22706
Summary: bfd/elf32-sh.c fails asserts without additional
information: sh4-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: BFD assertion
fail bfd/elf32-sh.c:5171
Product: binutils
Version: 2.30 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
Attempted to build glibc for sh4-unknown-linux-gnu target and got the following
errors:
LANG=C bash -x ./trigger-linker-system.sh
+ sh4-unknown-linux-gnu-ld -plugin
/usr/libexec/gcc/sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/6.4.0/liblto_plugin.so
-plugin-opt=/usr/libexec/gcc/sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/6.4.0/lto-wrapper
-plugin-opt=-fresolution=/tmp/ccvxcoL0.res --sysroot=/usr/sh4-unknown-linux-gnu
-m shlelf_linux -static -o
/tmp/portage/cross-sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-9999/work/build-default-sh4-unknown-linux-gnu-nptl/elf/sln
-L/usr/lib/gcc/sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/6.4.0
-L/usr/lib/gcc/sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/6.4.0/../../../../sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/lib
-L/usr/sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/lib -L/usr/sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/usr/lib -O1
--as-needed --hash-style=gnu
/tmp/portage/cross-sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-9999/work/build-default-sh4-unknown-linux-gnu-nptl/csu/crt1.o
/tmp/portage/cross-sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-9999/work/build-default-sh4-unknown-linux-gnu-nptl/csu/crti.o
/usr/lib/gcc/sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/6.4.0/crtbeginT.o
/tmp/portage/cross-sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-9999/work/build-default-sh4-unknown-linux-gnu-nptl/elf/sln.o
/tmp/portage/cross-sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-9999/work/build-default-sh4-unknown-linux-gnu-nptl/elf/static-stubs.o
--start-group
/tmp/portage/cross-sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-9999/work/build-default-sh4-unknown-linux-gnu-nptl/libc.a
-lgcc --end-group /usr/lib/gcc/sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/6.4.0/crtend.o
/tmp/portage/cross-sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-9999/work/build-default-sh4-unknown-linux-gnu-nptl/csu/crtn.o
sh4-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: BFD (Gentoo 2.29.1 p3) 2.29.1 assertion fail
/tmp/portage-tmpdir/portage/cross-sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/binutils-2.29.1-r1/work/binutils-2.29.1/bfd/elf32-sh.c:5171
sh4-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: BFD (Gentoo 2.29.1 p3) 2.29.1 assertion fail
/tmp/portage-tmpdir/portage/cross-sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/binutils-2.29.1-r1/work/binutils-2.29.1/bfd/elf32-sh.c:5174
sh4-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: BFD (Gentoo 2.29.1 p3) 2.29.1 assertion fail
/tmp/portage-tmpdir/portage/cross-sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/binutils-2.29.1-r1/work/binutils-2.29.1/bfd/elf32-sh.c:5176
...
The trigger issue here is likely glibc's lack of support gcc built as
--enable-default-pie but binutils ld error messages are not informative enough
to understand what is wrong with the code.
It's caused by BFD_ASSERT calls at:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=bfd/elf32-sh.c;h=9fa363615ddbb7629628b7fe500df93d0a27a8b0;hb=HEAD#l5141
I suggest changing calls like
BFD_ASSERT ((insn & 0xff00) == 0xd000);
to something like
if ((insn & 0xff00) != 0xd000)
_bfd_error_handler
/* xgettext:c-format */
(_("%B(%A+%#Lx): unexpected instruction %04X (expected 0xd0??, ?)"),
input_bfd, input_section, offset, insn);
That way error message would be:
ld/ld-new: libc.a(sched_yield.o)(.text+0x3a): unexpected instruction A005
(expected 0xd0??, mov.l)
ld/ld-new: libc.a(sched_yield.o)(.text+0x3c): unexpected instruction E0FF
(expected 0x0?12, stc)
ld/ld-new: libc.a(sched_yield.o)(.text+0x3e): unexpected instruction 0009
(expected 0x0?ce, mov.l)
It will help tweaking glibc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
