https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21507
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> --- Hi Michele, (Sorry for the delay in responding to your question. I have been rather distracted as of late). (In reply to Michele Sardo from comment #2) > In general, I noticed that every 'bl 0' instruction is printed with a label > associated with function at the address 0 of the section, that in the > particular example happen to be f itself. > Don't you think it would make more sense to print the relocation address > label ? Yes, it would be more helpful. I will add it to my list of things to do in my copious free time. :-) Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
