https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16720
--- Comment #3 from ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn ---
Hi all,
This bug still exist in the trunk code. Using the attached files, I can still
get the error "relocation truncated to fit: R_MIPS_HI16 against `_gp_disp'".
This is *NOT* right, as the mips abi said that R_MIPS_HI16 need no overflow
checks. Moreover, Only the o32 abi support R_MIPS_HI16 for _gp_disp, per the
mips abi. R_MIPS_HI16 should never get overflowed, because under o32 abi, the
address width is 32.
So, I think we should just get rid of the overflow check for R_MIPS_HI16.
Here is the patch for trunk.
--- bfd/elfxx-mips.c.orig 2016-11-28 23:09:23.343671301 +0800
+++ bfd/elfxx-mips.c 2016-11-28 23:23:49.452670956 +0800
@@ -5875,7 +5875,6 @@ mips_elf_calculate_relocation (bfd *abfd
value = mips_elf_high (addend + gp - p - 1);
else
value = mips_elf_high (addend + gp - p);
- overflowed_p = mips_elf_overflow_p (value, 16);
}
break;
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
