https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20805
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> --- But Jakub wrote in the gcc bug: »As for the ld.bfd optimization that makes linking with ld.bfd work, that is an optimization if there are any IE relocations then other GD/LD relocations are turned into them too, because once you have any IE relocations, all of the TLS has to be static anyway, so the TLS GD/LD calls are just a waste of time.« So either this is a missed optimization for gold, or ld.bfd generates wrong code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
