https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20499
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Stoeckmann <tobias at stoeckmann dot org> --- Oh, nice spotting with this "[^\n:]" parsing, I skipped validating that because this kind of expression was unknown to me. Always amazing to see what else pops up when more people look at the code! :) Yes, this patch looks correct. Now there's just the possible "num++" overflow on very large files left. Could hit amd64 or i386 with large file support. It takes a huge symbol file for that though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
