https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20308
--- Comment #5 from ncahill_alt at yahoo dot com ---
Regarding this update, I'm getting a failure on "make testsuite/pr20308a_test":
pr20308_gd.o:function test_gd: error: missing expected TLS relocation
gcctestdir/ld: error: missing expected TLS relocation
pr20308_ld.o:function test_ld: error: missing expected TLS relocation
pr20308_ld.o:function test_ld: error: missing expected TLS relocation
gcctestdir/ld: error: missing expected TLS relocation
I see this message twice in i386.cc:
------ line 634 ----------
~Relocate()
{
if (this->skip_call_tls_get_addr_)
{
// FIXME: This needs to specify the location somehow.
gold_error(_("missing expected TLS relocation"));
}
}
------ line 2787 -----------
const elfcpp::Rel<32, false> rel(preloc);
unsigned int r_type = elfcpp::elf_r_type<32>(rel.get_r_info());
if (this->skip_call_tls_get_addr_)
{
if ((r_type != elfcpp::R_386_PLT32
&& r_type != elfcpp::R_386_GOT32X
&& r_type != elfcpp::R_386_PC32)
|| gsym == NULL
|| strcmp(gsym->name(), "___tls_get_addr") != 0)
gold_error_at_location(relinfo, relnum, rel.get_r_offset(),
_("missing expected TLS relocation"));
else
{
this->skip_call_tls_get_addr_ = false;
return false;
}
}
---------------
One thing I notice is this:
00000066 R_386_GOT32 ___tls_get_addr
Hopefully that's the problem. Also I wonder if it would be helpful to make
those two error messages slightly different so one could pick out which is
which.
Thank you.
Neil.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
