https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20022

--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #7)
> Created attachment 9270 [details]
> Proposed patch
> 
> Hi H.J.
> 
>   OK - based upon your patch, but simplified quite a lot, here is a patch
> which
>   I think will produce the error message we want.  Please could you give it
> a try
>   and if you are happy with it let me know, so that I can check it in.
> 
> Cheers
>   Nick

  if (h->root.type != bfd_link_hash_undefined
       && h->root.type != bfd_link_hash_undefweak)
-    return NULL;
+    {
+      /* PR 20022  */
+      if (sec_name && info->gc_sections && h->root.u.undef.section == NULL)
+       info->callbacks->einfo (_("%X%P: error: undefined orphan section symbol
%s suggests that garbage collection failed\n"),
+                               h->root.root.string);
+      return NULL;
    }

Is it safe to check h->root.u.undef.section for defined symbol?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

Reply via email to