https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19722
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> --- Hi Nathan, > I'm not assembling this instruction, I am disassembling it from raw bytes. Ah - OK - that makes sense. I am not sure if it is really worth fixing this problem though. It would take a lot of effort to add code to check for all the possible undefined instructions in the AArch64 disassembler. I know that there already is code to display instructions whose binaries are completely unrecognised, but that is different. At the moment the disassembler does not have any code to detect illegal/undefined forms of recognised instructions, and adding that code would take a lot of time, and probably introduce new bugs. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
